CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
CT
Angiography

Cavernous hemangioma of liver

By mahyar


History: 40 Y/O female


Findings:

CT 1: CT :: CT 1 ::
CT







CT 2: CT :: CT 2 ::
CT







CT 3: CT :: CT 3 ::
CT







CT 4: CT :: CT 4 ::
CT







CT 5: CT :: CT 5 ::
CT







CT 6: CT :: CT 6 ::
CT







Fluoroscopy 1: Angiography :: Fluoroscopy 1 ::
Angiography









Discussion:
1. Best diagnostic clue: Peripheral nodular enhancement on arterial phase (AP) scan with slow progressive centripetal enhancement isodense to vessels.
2. Location: Common in subcapsular area in posterior right lobe of liver

Size
1. Vary from few millimeters to more than 20 cm
2. Giant hemangiomas: Larger than 10 cm (arbitrary)


Morphology:

1. Most common benign tumor of liver
2. Second most common liver tumor after metastases
3. More commonly seen in postmenopausal women
4. Usually solitary & grow slowly
5. May be multiple in up to 50% of cases
6. Calcification is rare (less than 10%) " Usually in scar of giant hemangioma "


CT Findings
NECT:
- Small (1-2 cm) & typical hemangioma (2-10 cm)
- Well-circumscribed, spherical to ovoid mass isodense to blood
- Giant hemangioma (more than 10 cm)
- Heterogeneous hypodense mass
- Central decreased attenuation (scar)

CECT:
Small hemangiomas ("capillary"): Less than 2 cm
- Arterial & venous phases: Show homogeneous enhancement ("flash filling")

Typical hemangiomas: 2-10 cm in diameter
- Arterial phase: Early peripheral, nodular or globular, discontinuous enhancement
- Venous phase: Progressive centripetal enhancement to uniform filling, still isodense to blood vessels
- Delayed phase: Persistent complete filling

Giant hemangioma: More than 10 cm in diameter
- Arterial phase: Typical peripheral nodular or globular enhancement
- Venous & delayed phases: Incomplete centripetal filling of lesion (scar does not enhance)

Atypical hemangioma: Inside to outside pattern
- Arterial phase: No significant enhancement
- Venous & delayed phases: Gradual enhancement from center to periphery (centrifugal filling)
- Hyalinized (sclerosed) hemangioma
- Shows minimal enhancement
- Cannot be diagnosed with confidence by imaging
- Hemangioma in cirrhotic liver
- Flash-filling of small lesions
- May lose characteristic enhancement pattern
- Capsular retraction
- Decrease in size over time

MR Findings
TlWI :
- Small & typical hemangiomas
- Well marginated
- Isointense to blood or hypointense
- Giant hemangioma
- Hypointense mass
- Central cleft like area of marked decreased intensity (scar or fibrous tissue)

T2WI:
- Small & typical hemangiomas
- Hyperintense, similar to CSF
- Giant hemangioma
- Hyperintense mass
- Marked hyperintense center (scar or fibrosis)
- Hypointense internal septa



T1 C+
- Small hemangiomas (less than 2 cm) : Homogeneous enhancement in arterial & portal phases .


- Typical & giant hemangiomas : Arterial phase: Peripheral, nodular discontinuous enhancement, Venous phase: Progressive centripetal filling, In both phases: Isointense to blood, Central scar: No enhancement & remains hypointense


Ultrasonographic Findings:

- Real Time:

Small hemangioma :
- Well-defined, hyperechoic lesion
- Size: Less than 2 cm

Typical hemangioma:
- Homogeneous hyperechoic mass with acoustic enhancement
- Size: 2-10 cm

Giant hemangioma:
- Lobulated heterogeneous mass with echoic border
- Size: More than 10 cm
- Atypical hemangioma
- Well-defined
- Iso-/hypoechoic mass with echoic rim
-
- Color Doppler:

- Show filling vessels in periphery of tumor
- No significant color Doppler flow in center of lesion

- Power Doppler:

- May detect flow within hemangiomas
- Flow pattern is nonspecific
- Similar flow pattern may be seen in hepatocellular carcinoma & metastases


Angiographic Findings:

- Dense opacification of lesion
- "Cotton wool" appearance
- Pooling of contrast medium within hemangioma
- Normal-sized feeders
- No neovascularity
- No arteriovenous shunting
- Typically retain contrast beyond venous phase


Nuclear Medicine Findings:

- Tc-99m labeled RBC scan with SPECT (95% accuracy)
- Early dynamic scan: Focal defect or less uptake
- Delayed scans (over 30-50 min): Persistent filling
- Vascular tumors (adenoma, HCC & FNH)
- All exhibit early uptake rather than a defect
- May have persistent uptake on delayed scan
- Rarely angiosarcomas exhibit hemangioma pattern
- Early defect & late uptake of isotope



Imaging Recommendations:

- Best imaging tool: Helical NE + CECT or MR
- Protocol advice: Arterial, venous & delayed scans


Demographics:
- Age: all age groups, more common in postmenopausal age group, uncommonly diagnosed in children, gender: M:F = 1:5.


Natural History & Prognosis:
1. Complications (extremely rare).
2. Spontaneous rupture
3. Abscess formation
4. Prognosis: Usually good
5. Often show slow growth





Differential diagnosis: 1. Peripheral (intrahepatic) cholangiocarcinoma:

- Delayed persistent enhancement, "fill in" may mimic hemangioma.
- Often heterogeneous, not isodense with vessels on CT.
- Not bright on T2WI.
- Often invades/obstructs vessels & bile ducts.

2. Hypervascular metastases:

- Usually multiple.
- Hyperdense in late arterial phase images.
- Hypo-or isodense on NECT & portal venous phase.
- Treated metastases may mimic hemangioma on imaging (e.g., breast).
- Not isodense to vessels on NECT or CECT : Examples: Islet cell, carcinoid, thyroid, renal carcinomas, heochromocytoma & some breast cancers.


Diagnosis confirmation: Surgery / Histo



Category: Gastrointestinal

Region / Organ: Abdomen-Liver

Etiology: neoplastic

References:
Diagnostic imaging. Abdomen / Michael P. Federle ... let al.




Get more for
Cavernous hemangioma of liver



Peer-reviewed resources
Peer-reviewed Radiology Search



Literature
More publications about Cavernous hemangioma of liver





Challenge yourself with the case quiz!



More teaching files from mahyar